A pay-per-use alternative to Hunter

Hunter answers the question “what addresses exist on this domain?”. TAPAC answers a different one: “who can I actually reach at this company right now, and is that mailbox still alive?” That second question is where most outreach budgets leak.

The difference in one table

TAPACHunter
Unit of workFind a person, verify the mailbox, return bothDomain search + separate verifier step
VerificationSMTP check on every returned contactVerifier is a separate product/credit
Bounce rate2–5% on returned contactsAny verified list decays: 40% of emails are dead within 2 years (NeverBounce)
Pricing model100 free searches, then $0.10–0.50 per contactFree tier of 50 credits; paid plans published from $34/month (hunter.io/pricing)
Cost of the Growth tierYou pay only for contacts you usePublished at $149/month on the Growth tier (hunter.io/pricing)
Agent accessMCP server — npx -y @tapacapi/mcpREST API (no MCP server)
Sources beyond a domainCompany websites, Discord servers, Telegram channelsWeb crawl by domain

Hunter pricing from hunter.io/pricing (published list prices). TAPAC figures from the product's own documentation.

Why the verification step is the whole point

23% of contacts change jobs every year (ZoomInfo, 2025). A list that looks clean in January is a bounce problem by the following January. TAPAC does the SMTP handshake at request time, so the record you receive carries its own verification status instead of an assumption.

What you give up

Hunter has a long history, a large index and deep integrations with CRMs and sequencers. If your process is “export a CSV, then sequence it in another tool”, that ecosystem is worth its price. TAPAC is narrower: find, verify, return — to an API caller or straight into an agent.

Try it

npx -y @tapacapi/mcp

Get a key at tapacapi.com/get-key — 100 free searches, then pay per verified contact. Full install notes on the MCP page.

Where to go next

← Back to TAPAC